A Biography of Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109)
A Biography of
Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109)
Saint
Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109) was an outstanding Christian philosopher and
theologian of the eleventh century. He is best known for the celebrated
“ontological argument” for the existence of God in chapter two of the Proslogion,
but his contributions to philosophical theology (and indeed to philosophy more
generally) go well beyond the ontological argument.
Anselm
was born in 1033 near Aosta. Little is known of his early life. He left home at
twenty-three, and after three years of apparently aimless travelling through
Burgundy and France, he came to Normandy in 1059. Once he was in Normandy,
Anselm's interest was captured by the Benedictine abbey at Bec, whose famous
school was under the direction of Lanfranc. Lanfranc was a scholar and teacher
of wide reputation and under his leadership the school at Bec had become an
important center of learning, especially in dialectic. In 1060 Anselm entered the
abbey as a novice. His intellectual and spiritual gifts brought him rapid
advancement, and when Lanfranc was appointed abbot of Caen in 1063, Anselm was
elected to succeed him as prior.
In
1093 Anselm was enthroned as Archbishop of Canterbury. The previous Archbishop,
Anselm's old master Lanfranc, had died four years earlier, but the King,
William Rufus, had left the see vacant in order to plunder the archiepiscopal
revenues. Anselm was understandably reluctant to undertake the primacy of the
Church of England under a ruler as ruthless and venal as William, and his
tenure as Archbishop proved to be as turbulent and vexatious as he must have
feared. William was intent on maintaining royal authority over ecclesiastical
affairs and would not be dictated to by Archbishop or Pope or anyone else.
Anselm's
motto is “faith seeking understanding” (fides quaerens intellectum).
This motto lends itself to at least two misunderstandings. First, many
philosophers have taken it to mean that Anselm hopes to replace faith
with understanding. If one takes ‘faith’ to mean roughly ‘belief on the basis
of testimony’ and ‘understanding’ to mean ‘belief on the basis of philosophical
insight’, one is likely to regard faith as an epistemically substandard
position; any self-respecting philosopher would surely want to leave faith
behind as quickly as possible. The theistic proofs are then interpreted as the
means by which we come to have philosophical insight into things we previously
believed solely on testimony.
Faith for Anselm is more of a
volitional state than an epistemic state: it is love for God and a drive to act
as God wills. Anselm argued: that "God is by definition that being than
which no greater can be conceived. But if God did not really exist, it would be
impossible to conceive of a greater being, namely one that does really exist.
Since the conclusion is absurd, the hypothesis that God does not really exist
must also be absurd. Therefore, God must really exist."
Comments
Post a Comment