Principles of Sacramental Theology


v    08/03/2012

F    Recommended Text Books

1.                  William Bausch: How to understand Sacraments
2.                  J. Komonchak et al: The Dictionary of theology
3.                  M. G Lawler: Symbols of Sacraments
4.                  B. Leeming: Principles of Sacramental Theology
5.                  Kane Osborne: Sacramental Theology

F    Introduction

Sacramental theology is one of the areas or subjects which have been discussed much in the Roman Catholic Church during the past century. This has affected not only the academic and theological life of the church but also the practical and liturgical life of the church. Since Vatican II, all the rites of the sacraments have been renewed, thereby taking profound changes. In the past century, sacramental theology has gone through revolutionary approach bringing deeper meaning in the church and in the celebration of the sacraments. This deeper meaning has affected the believers or members of the church. In recent years, we have seen profound changes in the celebration of the liturgy. These changes however, do not imply that the tradition has been abolished.

The study of the sacraments has three different presuppositions:

1.                  The ecclesiological presupposition which guides any theology and the practice of sacrament. It is a guiding principle for theology and the sacraments.

2.                  The undergirding theology which implies Christology. This also helps us to understand the church and Christ himself.

3.                  The interpretation of the scriptures, particularly the New Testament.

An historical-critical understanding of these presuppositions is very important especially when it comes to the interpretations of those aspects. In other words, you have to look at the history of the sacraments from a critical point of view especially when it comes to interpretations. Ecclesiology and Christology complements the principles of sacramental theology. Understanding the two gives us a solid foundation in our faith and it helps us to explain to other people what we have understood ourselves.

v    What is the connectivity between sacramental theology, ecclesiology and Christology?

F    The Meaning of Sacrament.
The Baltimore catechism tells us that a sacrament is an outward sign instituted by Christ to give grace. This definition is a nice one but it does not speak to the depth of our understanding of theology. St. Paul writes about the mysterion or mysteries that eventually came to be called sacraments. Eastern and Orthodox Churches still use the word ‘Mysterion’ or ‘Mysteries’ for the sacraments. In the early days of the church, these mysteries included what came to be known as the seven sacraments. But there was more to it than those seven sacraments.
At the time of the Patristic periods (2nd to 6th century), the sacramental action of the church had developed into rich series of rituals involved in the celebration of the sacraments. The official first time we see the list of sacraments as we have them now was during the time of Peter Lombard. He was the one who first draw a list of the sacraments in the so called “Sentences.” Prior to this, the sacraments looked different. For instance, the so called confirmation was part and parcel of the sacrament of baptism. Lombard separated confirmation from baptism because he saw that confirmation is a substantial sacrament on its own right.
v    23/4/2012

F    Sacraments as Presented in the New Testament
Jesus never used the term sacrament as we have it now nor did any of those who wrote the New Testament use it. Nowhere in the New Testament did we find the word sacrament used. The Greek word ‘mysterion’ or ‘mystery’ as we have seen earlier on is not the same as sacrament.
F    Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles
In the Acts of the Apostles we find a number of passages that testify to the presence of certain sacraments in some of the Christian communities.
F    Baptism

·                     Acts 2:41: “They accepted what he said and were baptised. That very day, about three thousand were added to their number.”

·                     Acts 8: 12: “But when they came to accept Philip’s preaching of the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptised, both men and women, and even Simon himself became a believer. After his baptism Simon went around constantly with Philip and was astonished when he saw the wonders and great miracles that took place.” 

·                     Acts 8: 38: “He ordered the chariot to stop, then Philip and the eunuch both went down into the water and he baptised him”

·                     Acts 9: 18: “It was as though scales fell away from his eyes and immediately he was able to see again. So he got up and was baptised, and after taking some food he regained his strength.”

·                     Acts 10: 48: “He then gave orders for them to baptised in the name of Jesus Christ. Afterwards they begged him to stay on for some days (Cornelius).



F    Eucharist as described by Luke
Acts 2:42 – 6: “These remained faithful to the teachings of the Apostles to the brotherhood, to the breaking of bread and to prayers. And everyone was filled with awe, the apostles worked many signs and miracles. All who shared the faith owned everything in common; they sold their goods and possessions and distributed the proceeds among themselves according to what each one needed.
Each day, with one heart, they regularly wet to the Temple but met in their houses for the breaking of bread; they shared their food gladly and generously; they praised God and were looked up to by everyone.”
F    Marriage according to Paul

1.                  1 Corinthians 7
2.                  Ephesians 5: 21-33

F    Prayer with the anointing of the sick
James 5: 14: “Any one of you who is in trouble should pray; anyone in good spirit should sing a psalm. Anyone of you who is ill should send for the elders of the church and they must anoint the sick person with oil in the name of the Lord and pray over him.”
F    The Rite of Laying on of Hands

·                     Acts 6: 6: “They presented these to the apostles, and after prayer they laid their hands on them.”

·                     Acts 8: 17: “Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.” – The Samaritan Converts.

F    Reconciliation

Ephesians 2: 15-16: “His purpose in this was, by restoring peace, to reconcile them both to God in one Body; in his own person he killed the hostility”

F    First Christians and the Sacraments
We noticed that the day after Pentecost, the first Christian community did not find themselves as possessing the seven sacraments as we know it today. When the twelve and their companions
were filled with the Holy Spirit, they went to different corners to proclaim he might deeds of God - Acts 2: 5-11. When people asked what they ought to do, Peter answered – “you must repent and be baptised in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.”
After the Pentecost narrative, Acts of the Apostles resumed with the life of the first Christian community and how they lived the life of some of the sacraments – Acts 2: 42. Here we have the evidence of baptism and the Eucharist. However, the way these sacraments were lived in different communities was not exactly the same. It was later that the Church decided on a common formula on the sacraments.
F    The Pauline Communities
Letters of Paul are the oldest written evidence of the life of the first communities. They were written down about 20 years after the death of Jesus. His first letter to the Corinthians speaks of baptism and the Eucharist as if they were already well known among the communities.
F    The Lord’s Pasch
The oldest narrative relating to the evening of Maundi Thursday is 1st Corinthians 11: 23-26: “For the tradition I received from the Lord and also hand on to you is that on the night he was betrayed, the Lord Jesus took some bread, and after he had had given thanks, he broke it, and said, ‘This is my body which is for you, do this in remembrance of me.’ And in the same way, with the cup after supper, saying ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Whenever you drink it, do this as a memorial of me”
F    Baptism
Paul as he was going along developed a comparison with the baptism and the crossing of the Red Sea. For Paul, baptism and the Eucharist are means of expression written in human life to proclaim the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This means that we are not living the baptism and Eucharist for ourselves but to proclaim the death and resurrection of Jesus. We are to die to ourselves and live for Christ. Our life does not end with death but with resurrection.
F    Marriage
Ephesians 5: 25-6 “Husbands should love their wives, just as Christ loved the Church and sacrificed  himself for her to make her holy by washing her in cleansing water with a form of words so that when he took the Church t himself, she would be glorious, with no speck, wrinkle or anything like that, but holy and faultless.”

In marriage the love between the man and the woman is that gives gift of self to each other. In marriage, the Paschal mystery of Christ is also expressed. Paul says husband should love their wives just as Christ loves the Church. The love between man and woman involves an identification with Christ as a gift to the Church.

In Paul’s letters, there was no talk about the rite of ceremonies of the sacraments. What we find there is that people were called to accompany Jesus in his journey to Easter and after resurrection. Though Paul did not use the word ‘sacrament’, yet we find that sacraments are there in his writings.

F    Sacraments in Matthew’s Communities

·                     Baptism

In Matthew’s Gospel, baptism makes a solid appearance. After his resurrection, Jesus sends his disciples on a mission – Matthew 28: 19-29. The baptism which the Church celebrates today goes back to the Lord’s command. In Matthew chapter 3; 13, we also find the same authority. Baptism is therefore a gift of the Lord to his disciples. It is not the Church’s creation but rather the Lord’s creation.

·                     Eucharist
Matthew also records the institution of the Eucharist – Matthew 26: 26 – 29. According to Matthew, the Lord gives command to the Church. He is the only evangelist who has: “Jesus said, take, eat, drink of it all of you.” And for baptism, the Church have to carry is as her mission entrusted by the Lord.
·                     Forgiveness
Matthew ends with forgiveness: 26: 27 – 28. Matthew links the Eucharist with the forgiveness of sins. For him, baptism, Eucharist and forgiveness are commanded by the Lord. Therefore in Matthew, we find the originality of the sacraments especially these three which are celebrated in the community. These sacraments are not for individuals but have to be celebrated within the community.
v    0/4/2012

F    Sacrament in the Christian Community according to Luke
Luke as we know is the author of the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles. It is therefore necessary to look at these two when considering his account of the presence of the sacraments in the Christian communities. Luke links the sacraments together but also he tries to interpret them for the community to enable them understand it.
Baptism for him is the sacrament on integration into the community while the Eucharist on the other hands helps the community to live that integration. The Acts of the Apostles was written 30 years later. By this time, Christianity has already spread through the Mediterranean region. Luke shows on occasions, the entry of new members into the communities but the first story for him, takes off from the Pentecost story. From the sacramental point of view, we find three aspects mentioned by Luke.
1.                  Repentance

For Luke, this repentance is a movement inwards. In other words, it starts from the person. This inward movement is done by the believer, it is a personal action.

2.                  Baptism

For Luke, this is the action of the community.

3.                  Receiving of the Holy Spirit.
For Luke, this is the action of God himself.
Luke discloses or unveils the rites of the community. We see the foundation of this in the community of Samaria in Acts 8: 5-17:
And Philip went to a Samaritan town and proclaimed the Christ to them. The people uninanimously welcomed the message Philip preached, because they had heard of the miracles he worked and because they say saw them for themselves. For unclean spirits came shrieking out of many who were possessed, and several paralytics and cripples were cured. As a result, there was great rejoicing in that town.
Now a man called Simon had for some time been practicing magic arts in the town and astounded the Samaritan people. He had given it out that he was someone momentous, and everyone believed in him; eminent citizens and ordinary people alike had declared, “He is the divine power that is called Great.’ He had this following because for a considerable period they had been astounded by his wizardry. But when they came to accept Philip’s preaching of the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptised, both men and women, and even Simon himself became a believer. After his baptism Simon went around constantly with Philip and was astonished when he saw the wonders and great miracles that took place.
When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them and they went down there and prayed for them to receive the Holy Spirit, for as yet he has not come down on any of them: they had only be baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid hands on the, and they received the Holy Spirit.
In this case, the conversion of Cornelius and his family, the natural procedure is reversed – God has come among them through baptism and the laying on of hands. Although Peter took the initiative in baptizing them, God is involved by bringing the Holy Spirit to them through Pater’s laying on of hands. In Acts 8: 38, we also see Philip baptising the Ethiopian eunuch.
F    Regular Life of the Community
For the Eucharist, Luke retains the old vocabulary of the first Christian community namely; the breaking of bread. We find this repeated on the Holy Thursday. We also find it in Luke 24: 30-34 in the way to Emmaus:
Now while he was with at table, he took the bread and said the blessing; then he broke it and handed it to them. And their eyes were opened and they recognised him, but he had vanished from their sight.
 Also in Acts 2: 42:
 These remained faithful to the teachings of the apostles, to the brotherhood, to the breaking of bread and to prayers.
This shows that the breaking of bread is part of their daily lives. It is a sacrament which helped them to live and move in the community. They were sharing together their poverty, they joy and their sorrows. This breaking of bread shows the presence of the living God himself.
F    Sacraments in the Gospel of St. John
John’s writing allows us to encounter second century generation. It was written later than the synoptic. John did not give the account of the Eucharist; yet, his gospel is full of symbolism which he puts as sacraments. We see this allusion in 3: 4-8
Nicodemus said’ “How can anyone who s already old be born? Is it possible to go back into the womb again and be born?’ Jesus replied:
In truth I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born through water and the Spirit. What is born of human nature is human, what is born of the Spirit is Spirit. Do not be surprised when I say: You must be born from above. The wind blows where it pleases, you can hear it sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.
5: 1 – 9:
After this there was a Jewish festival and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. Now in Jerusalem next to the Sheep Pool there is a pool called Bethesda in Hebrew, which has five porticos; and under these were crowds of sick people, blind, lame, paralysed.
One man there had an illness which has lasted thirty-eight years, and when Jesus saw him lying there and knew he had been in that condition for a long time, he said, ‘Do you want to be well again? Sir, replied the sick man, I have no one to put me into the pool when the water is disturbed and while I am still on the way, someone else gets there before me. Jesus said, ‘Get up, pick up your sleeping-mat and walk around. The man was cured at once, and he picked up his mat and started to walk around.
7: 37 – 39
On the last day, the great day of the festival, Jesus stood and cried out: “Let anyone who believes in me come and drink! As scripture says, “From his heart shall flow streams of living water.”  He was speaking of the Spirit which those who believe in him were to receive for there was no Spirit as yet because Jesus had not yet been glorified.
9: 6 – 7
Having said this, he spat on the ground, made a paste with the spittle, put this over the eyes of the blind man and said to him, “Go and wash in the Pool Siloam (the name means ‘one who has been sent). So he went off and washed and came back able to see.
Water is used as part of purification, to bring a new life.
19: 33 – 34
Came to Jesus, they saw he was already dead, and so instead of breaking his legs, one of the soldiers pierced his side with a lance, and immediately there came out blood and water.
2: 1 – 12:
The water at Cana already proclaims the new wine – the Eucharist.

6: 1 – 66
The multiplication of the loaves signifies the Eucharist.
F    Why is John interested in symbolism rather than mentioning the sacraments directly?
The Gospel of John was written much later. Consequently there are varied reasons John adopted this approach.
1.                  The communities have lived the sacraments already. He was therefore interested in the spiritual meaning of these sacraments instead.

2.                  He wants his readers to go beyond the external signs. He wants the community members to go deeper in their spiritual life and also to understand those signs of Jesus.

3.                  For John, Jesus’ whole life was a baptism live in the communities in order to find the experience of God. He therefore goes beyond the action of baptism itself. Hence he says: “Unless we are born of water and the spirit, we are doomed to die.”   3:5

4.                  Moreover, Jesus’ entire life was Eucharistic – 6: 48 - 51:

I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate manna in the desert and they are dead, but this is the bread which comes down from heave so that a person may eat it and not die. I am the living bread which has come down from heave. Anyone who eats this bread will live forever, and the bread that I shall give is my flesh for the life of the world.
Conclusion:
From the beginning, the first Christian communities lived with the riches of sacramental life. Each community has its own way of speaking of the importance of the sacrament. For Paul, the sacraments are ways of living the Paschal Mystery. For him, the sacraments link us with the death of Christ in order to make us partakers of his resurrection. He also associates married life with baptism and the Eucharist.
For Matthew, the sacramental rites given by Jesus are a sign of his presence in the church. Matthew links baptism, Eucharist with forgiveness.
Luke on the other hand, it is the Holy Spirit which accompanies the work of the church and makes it fruitful. In Luke we find the rites of baptism, Eucharist and the laying of hands.
For John, baptism and Eucharist makes us partakers of true life. These sacraments help us to know, and understand God better. Hence he deals with symbols and signs.
·                     Why is Jesus called the primordial sacrament?
·                     Why is the Church called a sacrament?

v    07/05/2012

F    Modern Understanding of Sacramental Theology
Having seen what we have seen, we need to advance further to see what modern theologians say about sacramental theology. Some of these theologians talks of sacramental participation. According to them, the celebration or the participation of members in the sacraments enables them to be like Jesus. As the members participate in the sacraments, this helps them to bring the reign of God (the kingdom of God) here on earth.
Most theologians, especially those of the Protestant faith are talking about two sacraments; namely, baptism and the Eucharist. The Catholic tradition has however, maintained the tradition of seven sacraments. Apart from baptism and the Eucharist, we also have Order, Marriage, Confirmation, Anointing of the sick, and Penance. The church decimates these sacraments and since they are decimated through the church, Jesus remains the epicenter or nexus of these sacraments. Jesus remains the primordial sacrament. In other words, Jesus lives and acts through the sacraments. The Catechism of the Catholic Church number 1076 confirms this when it says:
The Church was made manifest to the world on the day of Pentecost by the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. The gift of the Spirit ushers in a new era in the ‘dispensation of the mystery’ – the age of the Church, during which Christ manifests, makes present and communicates his work of salvation through the liturgy of his Church, ‘until he comes.’ In this age of the Church, Christ now lives and acts in and through the sacraments in a new way appropriate to this new age. He acts through the sacraments in what the common Tradition of the East and the West calls “the sacramental economy”, this is he communication (or “dispensation”) of the fruits of Christ’s Paschal mystery in the celebration of the Church’s ‘sacramental” liturgy.
F    Edward Schillebeecks
Edward Schillebeeckx is a Dutch theologian. He has written extensively on the sacraments especially during the 1950s and 60s. His writings were very much linked with the scholastic writings and the fathers of the Church. He sees the sacraments as outward signs which reveal the divine reality. For him, the sacraments makes the participants fall in love with God by opening themselves up to God. For him, the sacraments are an encounter with the Risen Lord. Every time we celebrate a sacrament, we do encounter Jesus Christ. Therefore we make a deep relationship with Him.
Schillebeeckx makes us understand the sacraments better than the scholastics because the scholastics were using philosophical intellectual language to describe the sacraments. Languages such as: substance, accident, matter, form, essence and so forth. Schillebeeckx on the other hand, restores the sense of awe, the sense of wonder which was there at the beginning of the early Christian community. However, the scholastics helped us to understand “what” the sacraments are with their strong philosophical language.
By the time of Vatican II (1962 – 65), the ideas of Schillebeeckx had already permeated the Church just like the ideas of Thomas Aquinas which influenced the council of Trent. In 1960, Schillebeecks published one of his books: “Christus Sacrament van de Godsontmoeting”, meaning “Christ the sacrament of the encounter with God”, which has been translated by C. Ernst. The book was translated into many languages, hence its influence during the Second Vatican Council.
F    Karl Rahner
Karl Rahner approached the sacraments from a different perspective. He expressed the reality of sacraments as an experience of God. He was approaching the sacraments from the phenomenological and existential perspective. He was trying to describe the sacraments from the human experience. One of the problems that many people had with his writing is that he holds that there was no Biblical proof that Jesus instituted the sacraments. His reasons are:
1.                  The sacrament of marriage for instance predated Jesus. So he was not the one who instituted it.

2.                  Jesus was baptised by John. So he did not institute the sacrament of baptism.

3.                  That there is no proof of Jesus confirming anyone.

4.                  According to Rahner, Jesus instituted instead, a sacramental Church and the Church in turn instituted the sacraments because of the needs of the people. Karl Rahner therefore spoke of the Church as a radical sacrament. According to him, sacraments represent the grace of God which is made available by the Church. Invariably, the implication of Karl Rahner’s position is that Christ instituted the sacraments through the Church.

F    The Church as a basic Sacrament
The idea of the Church as a basic sacrament or as sacramental Church makes no sense unless Jesus is the primordial sacrament. That is, if Jesus is not the epicenter of the Church. The Church and Jesus go hand-in-hand as we celebrate the sacraments – we cannot exclude one from the other. We cannot accept Jesus as primordial sacrament unless we accept the Church as a basic sacrament. In the documents of Vatican II, the Bishops have accepted that the Church is a basic sacrament. Seven (7) times explicitly and once implicitly, the documents speak of the Church as a basic sacrament. We find these in LG article 1, LG, articles 9 and 48; GS. 45; SC. 2 and 5; AG 5 – referring to Matthew 28: 18. Nowhere did the Church or the Council define the use of the sacraments. This implies that the Church has let this definition open to the theologians and those celebrating to define it in their own context.
F    The Church and the Seven Sacraments
The Roman Catholic Community decided officially at the Council of Trent (1547), that there are seven sacraments. Why did the Council made this decision? This is because Calvin, Luther, Zwingli and others were maintaining that there only two sacraments – baptism and the Eucharist. The Church was against this reduction. It is clear at the time of the Reformation, the Church held that there seven sacraments; these sacraments were named and explained individually in all the official documents. This explanation of the seven sacraments was based upon previous teachings and clarifications of sacramental theology which were made at the Council of Lyons (1274). They also looked at the Council of Florence of 1439. Before the clarification in 1547, different communities were using the ritual for sacraments differently.
F    Brief Historical overview of the Sacraments
Long before the Church had developed a definition of the sacraments – 11th to 12th centuries, the Church had already been living those sacraments. Therefore sacramental theology or sacramentology is a reflection of the already lived experience of the Church. What is lived today therefore is part of the experience of the Church fathers.
·                     Baptism and the Eucharist
These two sacraments came into existence in 270 AD. They go back to the time of Jesus
·                     Reconciliation
We find this sacrament in the writings of Hermes – 140 – 150 AD. We find a clear reference to the rite of reconciliation and baptism.
·                     Orders and the Anointing of the sick
We find this around 200 AD from the writings of the Apostolic Tradition of Hypolitus around 215 AD. We also find the rite of the anointing of the sick with Hypolitus.
·                     Marriage
Around 400 AD, we begin to see on reliable historical data that the Church officials begin to enter into the marriage rite. A clear sacramental acceptance of marriage is only seen in the 12th century. This means that it took so long to accept marriage as a sacrament. The reason behind this is because of the sexual connotation part of it. Many theologians were asking how sexuality can be seen as a means of grace.
·                     Confirmation
Around 1000 Ad, we see that confirmation was accepted as a separate rite. We see that the sacraments were not made in one day. It took centuries before they became what they are today.
v    14/5/2012

F    Baptism
This is the first sacrament we receive as Catholics. It is one of the three sacraments of initiative; the others are confirmation and the Eucharist. By receiving baptism, we become part of the Church and a new people. Baptism is received once in a life time. In a situation where there is doubt if a person is baptised, he or she receives a conditional baptism. Baptism is administered by immersion or infusion.
The word ‘baptism’ is borrowed from Greek and it means deepening in water. Through the ritual of baptism, the person participates in the dying and rising in the life of Christ. For some people, baptism by immersion is more meaningful than just pouring water on the head. This should not put us off anyway, as what is important is the meaning behind that ritual. Up to the 5th century, most baptism candidates were adults. After this time, the Church started emphasising infant baptism because of the original sin. The Church believes that baptism removes original sin. Infants are also born with original sin and baptising them will enable them to participate in the new life of baptism; hence the necessity of baptising infants. Adults take longer time to prepare for baptism. They were immersed in water but also receive the Eucharist and the Bishop lays hand on them. The whole action therefore is carried out simultaneously and generally it takes place on Easter Vigil.
Today, we have two ways of preparing for baptismal Rite of Christian Initiation for Adult (RCIA) and the rite of Christian initiation for infants. That of the adults takes longer time ranging from tow 92) to three (3) years depending on the country. That of the infants however does not take much time because it is believed that the sponsors will continue to teach the child as he or she grows.
Baptism is about life and in baptism we celebrate life since we are born anew in the Spirit. The Church holds that baptism can take place at any age depending on when a person is ready or when the sponsors of such a person are ready. There is therefore no restriction or limitation as regards the age at which a person can be baptised.

F    Confirmation

The sacrament of confirmation has complex historical development and a different…… However, this sacrament cannot be separated from the other sacraments – baptism and the Eucharist. The Orthodox Church has always maintained that confirmation and baptism cannot be separated. In fact, they are celebrated together. They are intrinsically bound together.

F    Confirmation as independent sacrament
From the early date of the Church, certain elements of baptism began to receive different emphasis and meaning. Gradually this led to the separation of baptism and confirmation. Some scholars however, maintain that there is no ground for separating them. The separation of these sacraments is an issue of the post-New Testament – cf; Acts 8: 12- 17; Acts 19: 1 – 7; Hebrews 6: 2. A Biblical principles of sacramental theology must envisage the Salvific action of the Spirit as a Messianic gift (John 19: 30). The Spirit sustains the Church throughout the ages. He makes sure that the faith of the Church is maintained.
Tertullian in his book “De Baptismo” (200 AD), divided baptism into two:
1.                  Water Bath with its anointing
2.                  The imposition of hands with the gift of the Spirit.
The Apostolic tradition of Hyppolytus (215 AD0 indicates that there were some post-baptismal anointing done by the bishop to complete the baptism. Pope Innocent (416 AD) in a letter to Bishop Gubbio, puts it very strictly that the priest may anoint the baptised with chrism but they are not to sign the brow with the oil. This was reserved to the Bishops alone when people are confirmed.
F    Bishop Faustus of Riez, (458).
Faustus delivered a sermon on Pentecost which had played a great role in the history of the Church and the sacraments especially the sacrament of confirmation. He expounded on the doctrinal separation of confirmation from baptism. For him, baptism is as complete as innocence or purity but it needs the grace of confirmation. Why? Because baptism regenerates the life of the one baptised. However, in other to be equipped for the Christian battle, the baptised Christian needs to be confirmed. Through baptism, a person is cleansed and washed. In confirmation, he is strengthened. In the Middle Ages therefore, confirmation – which is often administered on Easter Vigil, gradually became separated from baptism. By the 11th century, confirmation in the West had been separated from baptism and it was administered at the age of ten (10) years.
Some people at this time, such as Hincmar, the Bishop of Rheims, were of the opinion that with confirmation, a person becomes a soldier of Christ. The scholastic theologians treated the sacrament of confirmation not in the older context of initiation but more in the context of what effect the sacrament has on the person being confirmed. For them, they treated the understanding of Bishop Faustus for granted. Thomas Aquinas also saw the sacrament of confirmation as a spiritual maturity for spiritual battle against the enemies of the faith.
F    The Council of Trent - 1547
The Council of Trent dealt with the sacrament of confirmation from the point of view against the Reformers who denied it. For the Reformers, the Church is insisting so much on the rite of laying on of hands without looking at the substance of the sacrament. Vatican II document on the sacred liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium number 71 has this to say concerning the sacrament of confirmation:
The rite of confirmation is to be revised also so that the intimate connection of this sacrament with the whole of the Christian initiation may more clearly appear. For this reason the renewal of baptismal promises should fittingly precede the reception of this sacrament. Confirmation may be administered within Mass when convenient. For conferring outside Mass, a formula introducing the rite should be drawn up.

The connection of confirmation with the total initiation process is the key for our understanding.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUMMARY OF PROVIDENTISSIMUS DEUS, ENCYCLICAL LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII ON THE STUDY OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURE.

summary and appraisal of chapters one, two and three of the book The African Origin of Greek Philosophy: An Exercise in Afrocentrism, by Innocent C. Onyewuenyi.

THE LAST THREE WAYS TO PROVES GOD'S EXISTENCE BY THOMAS AQUINAS