THALES, ANAXIMANDER, ANAXIMENES,
THALES
Thales
is considered by many authorities to be the first western philosopher and he
was the Greek sage who predicted the 585 B.C solar eclipse. Thales lived around
624 and 545 B.C. a native of ‘Miletus’ in the seaport of ‘Ionia’ in the western
coast of Asian Minor. Due to the geographical location of Miletus, it excelled
in commerce, wealth and cosmopolitan ideas. Apart from predicting the 6th
century eclipse, Thales was believed to have a practical mind and an engineer
who repairs things for military and invented navigational instruments and
technique.
Thales
embarked on finding out the basic stuff that unifies the multiplicity of our
sense experience; this quest can be rephrased to be a problem of ‘one and the
many’. There were four basic elements testified that time, namely; water,
earth, air and fire. In answering this question, Thales named water to be that
fundamental element that unifies the world. He reasoned that water is that
element that brings life, all life, both plant and animal is dependent on water
to survive. He also reasoned that everything is transformed into water, for
example, liquid water can be transformed into gas (steam) or could be made
solid (ice) and water comes from air inform of rain and returns to it inform of
mist, when it evaporates from a dish, it leaves a sediment (earth) and when one
digs deep inside the earth, he will definitely reach to water. Furthermore,
owing to his native town (Miletus) which is surrounded by water, he probable
thinks everything to be from water. Thales also believed that everything is
full of gods and therefore possess an animate power in them.
Thales
played a significant role in the development of western philosophy, his answer
to the basic stuff underscores a metaphysical monism, in the sense that he
proposed that there is only one principle in explaining reality, this was
upheld by most of his successor only that some made recourse to an immaterial
entity. He also deposited that this monist principle is a material one and
lastly, he asked questions that has no immediate practical payoff but which
demanded for a theoretical understanding for its own sake and he made
contributions to answer the questions he asked. The turning point in the
development of human thought is to be found in original question as much as in
insightful answers. He made no appeal to gods or tradition and his opinion
developed a ground for rational speculation and debate.
ANAXIMANDER
Anaximander
is a younger contemporary of Thales, he lived around 610 to 545 B.C. in same
locality with Thales (Miletus in Ionia) and some sources acclaimed him to be a
student of Thales. Anaximander asked the same question like Thales did about
the fundamental stuff and the process of change. Notably, Anaximander held the
same monist view about this stuff like Thales but was dissatisfied with it
being water. Anaximander stated that water is just one of the basic elements
and it would fail to account for such element like fire. In answering the
question, he stated that this element must be eternal, imperishable and prior
to every other thing, thus it must be able to account for them. This stuff was
termed ‘apeiron’by Anaximander and it
connotes the stuff to mean the boundless, and the indefinite. Anaximander made
no effort to identify the nature of this element because it is prior and the
cause of every other visible thing and therefore must not be identified among
them.
In
accounting for change, he posited that the world is made up of warring
opposites, thus one cannot beget the other but must come from a prior stuff. He
explained change to be a process of separating out from and returning to the
fundamental stuff. He further explained the boundless to be a whirling mass in
which things flung out from and this in a way demonstrated how the planet
received their motion. He claimed that through the effect of warring opposite,
cold and hot were produced and so were every other thing. He also asserted that
all life form including human originally came from the sea. In Anaximander’s
view, the earth rests on nothing since it is the center of a spherical
universe; it has no reason to move to anywhere. He also recognized that from
standpoint of the universe as a whole, there will be no up or down. He
explained the world to be an everlasting motion made up creation and
destruction cycle. He retained the notion of moral force and uses the principle
of justice to explain the cycle, everything borrowed its existence from the
boundless and must return it one day.
Anaximander introduced a speculative reasoning of
considering immaterial substances; the boundless according to its features is
eternal, boundless and indefinite. He also introduced a form of philosophical
criticism, having learned from Thales, he was dissatisfied with Thales
position, exposed the limits and weaknesses and went on to make his own
assertion. He also made effort to give a reasonable account of how things
change and through his principle of justice, tried to give an early version of
natural law.
ANAXIMENES
Anaximenes is a younger contemporary of Anaximander,
he dates around 545B.C. and was the third of the Milesian philosopher. He asked
the same basic question as his predecessor about the fundamental stuff. He
agrees with Anaximander that the basic stuff should be eternal, unlimitedand
singular but he refused to accept apeiron to be that element. He maintained
that whatever this element should be, we must have at least a small knowledge
of it. He asserted that this element is ‘air’ because he observed that air is
more pervasive than water, it is central to all nature, necessary for life and
can be found in every other element like water, fire and earth and the soul is
identical to air. He further stated that water falls whenever it fails to be
supported by the air, thus cannot stand on its own but the air is able to stand
on its own, therefore, water cannot hold the earth as Thales said but the air
can hold it.
He accounted for change by two principles, rarefaction
or condensation. When the air is extremely rarified it becomes warm and then
fire but when condensed, it gets cold, becomes wind, water, earth and finally
stone. He provided an experimental process that when one opens wide his mouth
and blow out air, that air would be warm but when one squeezes it as to
whistle, the air that comes from it would be cold. He contributed to philosophy
development in two ways. Firstly, he showed that abstract thought must be
conceptually clarified i.e. when we claim the basic stuff is indefinite and we
will know less about it and secondly, he involved a scientific experimental
sort of explanation to demonstrate change.
SUMMARY
These Milesian philosophers demonstrated a sort of
early epistemological and metaphysical positions. Thales and Anaximenes through
their claim classified themselves to be empiricists because they held sensible
entities to be the primordial stuff while Anaximander was grouped among the
rationalist because his apeiron underline a conceptual substance. On the base
of metaphysics, all of them held that a single entity should account for other
numerous entities in the world, thus they were grouped to be Monist.
Comments
Post a Comment