The task of a theologian is basically interpretive. In a case of diverse interpretation, how do we know the true doctrine?
The task of a
theologian is basically interpretive. In a case of diverse interpretation, how
do we know the true doctrine?
Answer Using Vincentian Canon:
For Vincent of Lerins to separate authentic interpretation from
aberration, he presents canon known as the Vincentian canon. Vincentian canon
is “quod semper, quod ubique, quod ad ominibus” that is, holding unto that
faith that is believed always, everywhere, and by all. Hence for a correct
interpretation of the scripture, we should observe this canon based on
universality (what is believed everywhere), antiquity (what is believed always)
and unanimity (what is believing by everyone).
Answer using Augustine De
Doctrina
Augustine in his De Doctrina
Christiana presents that for there to be correct interpretation, you must
follow catholicity, that is, wholeness of scripture, identify with the
apostolic seats, the epistles and canonicity of scripture accepted by important
churches especially the Church of Rome which has a primacy.
Answer using Newman
Newman emphasizes the need for continuity, connectivity to traditions
and an infallible authority.
Hence Augustine and Newman reiterates the Vincentian Canon.
Answer using Gadamer
For Gadamer, correct interpretation of scripture takes place within the
hermeneutical key of tradition. Although we have a fore-knowledge of the test
flowing from each person horizon, tradition is the sure way to correct
interpretation.
Answer using Dei Verbum
Dei Verbum re-emphasizing their views maintains that the magisterium,
(which is like cleaning house) is needed to avoid conflicting individual
interpretation. It posits that since the scripture belongs to the church to the
magisterium, the teaching authority of the church.
Answer using Verbum Domini
Verbum Domini reiterates these views maintaining that the Church is the
primary setting for proper hermeneutics. Secularized hermeneutics should be
avoided biblical hermeneutics built on faith and reason that enable holistic
(catholic) reading should be adopted.
Verbum Domini insists that the scriptural interpretation is understood
through the church’s tradition. Therefore, one cannot have correct
interpretation outside the settin of the church. Thus, while Newman echoes
Augustine and Vincent of Lerins, Dei verbum echoes Newman and Verbum Domini
captures Dei Verbum.
Comments
Post a Comment