Whether in the Science of Faith, Which Is Concerning God, it Is Permissible to Use the Rational Arguments of the Natural Philosophers Objections
Whether in the Science of Faith, Which
Is Concerning God, it Is Permissible to Use the Rational Arguments of the
Natural Philosophers Objections
that gifts of grace are added to those of
nature in such a way that they do not destroy the latter, but rather perfect
them; wherefore also the light of faith, which is gratuitously infused into our
minds, does not destroy the natural light of cognition, which is in us by
nature. For although the natural light of the human mind is insufficient to
reveal those truths revealed by faith, yet it is impossible that those things
which God has manifested to us by faith should be contrary to those which are
evident to us by natural knowledge. Otherwise, God would be the author of
error, a thing which is impossible. If, however, anything is found in the
teachings of the philosophers contrary to faith, this error does not properly
belong to philosophy, but is due to an abuse of philosophy owing to the
insufficiency of reason. For just as those things which are of faith cannot be
demonstratively proved, so certain things contrary to them cannot be
demonstratively shown to be false, but they can be shown not to be necessary.
Thus, in sacred doctrine we are able to
make a threefold use of philosophy: First, to demonstrate those truths that are
preambles of faith and that have a necessary place in the science of faith.
Such are the truths about God that can be proved by natural reason—that God
exists, that God is one; such truths about God or about His creatures, subject
to philosophical proof, faith presupposes. Secondly, to give a clearer notion,
by certain similitudes, of the truths of faith, as Augustine in his book, De
Trinitate, employed any comparisons taken from the teachings of the
philosophers to aid understanding of the Trinity. In the third place, to resist
those who speak against the faith, either by showing that their statements are
false, or by showing that they are not necessarily true.
Comments
Post a Comment