With Gregory Nazianzen’ description of the nature of theology in the background, do you think a scholar can be addressed as a theologian of a religion he/she does not practice?

-

With Gregory Nazianzen’ description of the nature of theology in the background, do you think a scholar can be addressed as a theologian of a religion he/she does not practice?
Theology for Gregory is to philosophise about God. But it does not belong to everyone to philosophise about God. It is permitted to only those who have been examined and are masters in meditation, purified I soul and body or at least are being purified. It is permitted to only those who take the subject matter of theology serious. It is only when one knows God that one can speak about God and apprehend the truth. Thus, to know God, there must be conversion and purity.
A theologian is someone going through the process of conversion. Conversion is not just a pre-requisite, it is a guide to theology. Theologizing about God also involves acting (living relationship).
Thus, given the above, a scholar cannot be addressed as a scholar he/she does not practice because, although a scholar may have eloquence and understanding of something in the religion, these are not sufficient to speak about God. Speech about God requires knowledge of God, eloquence, conversion and purity as necessary conditions. It requires constant conversion expressed in three ways
a.       Intellectual conversion- geared towards the truth.
b.      Moral conversion- towards the good
c.       Spiritual conversion- comprising intellectual and moral.
Hence, if a scholar cannot fulfil these requirements, he/she cannot speak about God. A theologian is always on his knees when doing theology.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SUMMARY OF PROVIDENTISSIMUS DEUS, ENCYCLICAL LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII ON THE STUDY OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURE.

-
SUMMARY OF PROVIDENTISSIMUS DEUS, ENCYCLICAL LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII ON THE STUDY OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURE.      God has elevated man, freed him of guilt and ruin, restored him to his initial dignity and has made known to him the mystery of his divinity.      He revealed himself through the inspiration of the holyspirit to man. This supernatural revelation, the church believe, is contained in both written tradition and written books which is called sacred and canonical. God himself is the author of the sacred book, he composed the book; the words of the book are his words.      Priests are encouraged to read this sacred book, meditate over it, ponder on it and explain it to the people. The apostolic office also enjoins them to help in making this sacred book reach the Christians and also to defend it against the attack of the heretics.      The holy spirit himself testifies that all the scripture i...
Read more

summary and appraisal of chapters one, two and three of the book The African Origin of Greek Philosophy: An Exercise in Afrocentrism, by Innocent C. Onyewuenyi.

-
Introduction Can Africans philosophize? Is there such a thing as African philosophy? What contribution has Africans made on the world’s civilization and on the discipline of philosophy? These and a plethora of questions are seeking answers in today’s modern world. Africa is being conceived by the world as savages, primitive, her people as those that reside in the Dark Continent who are intellectually inferior. Thus, Africans have not contributed anything to the discipline of philosophy. Hence, this work by Innocent Onyewuenyi aims at answering these questions and at reinstating the truth that philosophy has its origin in the Egyptian Mystery System. In view of this, it is our aim in this paper to summarize and appraise chapters one, two and three of the book The African Origin of Greek Philosophy: An Exercise in Afrocentrism, by Innocent C. Onyewuenyi. To achieve this, we shall begin with a summary of the three chapters followed by an appraisal. Furthermore, we shall present ...
Read more

THE LAST THREE WAYS TO PROVES GOD'S EXISTENCE BY THOMAS AQUINAS

-
THE LAST THREE WAYS TO PROVES GOD'S EXISTENCE BY THOMAS AQUINAS FROM POSSIBILITY AND NECESSITY ITS ARGUEMENT In nature, we find things that are possible to be and not to be, that come from being and go out of being as contingent beings. Imagine every being is a contingent being, for each contingent being, there come a time it is not in existence, which makes it impossible for these to always be in existence. There could have been a time when nothing existed. At that time there would have been nothing to bring the currently existing contingent beings into existence. So therefore, nothing would be in existence now. We have reached a common sense result from assuming that every being is a contingent being. It implies that not every being is a contingent being, some being exists of its own necessity, and does not receive its existence from another being but rather causes them. This people term it as Supreme Being, God. ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN       ...
Read more